Libraries and Intellectual Freedom: Protecting Individual
Privacy
Joseph
Mhanna
LIS
6010 Blog Assignment
The
issue of intellectual freedom has been a matter of debate for several decades. The
American Library Association defines intellectual freedom as “the right of
every individual to both seek and receive information from all points of view
without restriction. It provides for free access to all expressions of ideas
through which any and all sides of a question, cause or movement may be
explored.” This is an essential human right in order to have a decision based
on knowledge.
Democracy is defined by the Oxford English Dictionary (OED) as “a system of government in which all the people of a state or polity (or, esp. formerly, a subset of them meeting particular conditions) are involved in making decisions about its affairs, typically by voting to elect representatives to a parliament or similar assembly.” The ALA considers intellectual freedom as the basis for a democratic system and expect people to be self-governors. But to achieve this responsibility, the citizens must be well-informed. Therefore an educated population is a fundamental element of democracy. Libraries are major places representing intellectual freedom and they have always opposed any kind of censorship. Librarians strive to provide balanced collections to present both sides of an issue. Brey (2002) posited “there are many things in any library collection that are sure to offend someone, because we represent the points of view of all the people” (p. 30). In this context, intellectual freedom upholds democracy. It provides people the ability to access needed information to make a decision based on knowledge and information. Brey (2002) explained “as librarians, we must never forget the basic tenets of our profession. We are places of democracy, of opportunity for the diverse communities that we serve” (p. 31).
Our privacy is under attack from
various sources; governments have been keeping surveillance through various
medium such as wire recordings, data mining and mail interceptions. Moreover, the
technological advancement has made it possible for governments to expand the
scope of surveillance. The big problem is that not only are governments monitoring
our lives but our privacy is exposed to hackers who can unveil sensitive
materials and information, invade a credit card account and many other private
issues.
One of the core values of librarianship
is intellectual freedom and privacy is an essential part in exercising
intellectual freedom. “The American Library Association affirms that rights of
privacy are necessary for intellectual freedom and are fundamental to the
ethics and practice of librarianship.” Libraries have always defended and
respected the privacy of their users. Lack of privacy prevents users from
seeking information and exploring new ideas because they are afraid of being
monitored and being faced by criminal charges or ostracism based on their
access to information that are considered a threat to national security.
Reading books on terrorism or how to make a bomb does not necessarily mean that
the reader is a terrorist. It is critical for societies to have innovation and
this process relies on people accessing information to explore new ideas,
retrieve and criticize old ones, and formulate new conclusions. The ALA states
that “lack of privacy and confidentiality chills users' choices, thereby
suppressing access to ideas. The possibility of surveillance, whether direct or
through access to records of speech, research and exploration, undermines a
democratic society.”
With the technological advances
and increased numbers of electronic publications, access to the Internet became
an essential resource in libraries. Similarly, issues of privacy and
confidentiality are becoming more complex and critical for library users. The question
is how libraries can protect the privacy of the patrons. Every library should
have in place privacy policies to govern the revelation of patrons’ use of
information. Moreover, libraries should continuously plan to train staff and
educate patrons about the status of their privacy rights and necessary activities
that could help in protecting those rights. The increased use of electronic
information raised more concerns with respect to privacy; libraries are using
the service of third-party vendors to supply electronic content to patrons. The
problem is that vendors are capable of tracking patrons’ data while using
digital devices and accessing e-content. Chmara (2012) explains that “based on
research conducted by various digital organizations, it appears that the
third-party vendors have the capability to track patron data and use of
information on digital devices” (p. 64). Libraries should extend the protection
of library use to electronic resources. The author also states that “contractual
provisions governing use of electronic reading devices by library patrons
should ensure that the patron’s browsing of reading materials, download of
reading materials, and reading habits will note be divulged to any other
parties without the specific permission of the individual user” (p. 65).
However, the feasibility of such contracts remains questionable. On a different
level, less complex procedures to limit privacy violations in libraries include
elimination of sign in sheets, avoid using smart ID for circulating records and
providing private workstation with no monitoring.
As
a general overview of the intellectual freedom in
Lebanon, the Lebanese Library Association (LLA) sets the professional standards
and ethical codes and ensures their implementation. However, there are no
written policies addressing the notion of intellectual freedom. Therefore, the
presence of an interdisciplinary collection meeting the different needs of all
users is not feasible in Lebanese public libraries; there are many factors that
come to play in determining the type of collection such as political views,
religious views, and location of the library. It is rare, for example, to find
a book about GLBT and erotic literature in public libraries.
Things
are different in academic libraries. Inspired by the values and beliefs of the
ALA, academic libraries are active in protecting individual privacy and
advocating intellectual freedom. In major academic libraries users can find a
book about almost any topic. Even banned books are usually available as “closed
circulation” materials where users can use them within the library building.
Privacy is respected by all means such as providing individual workstations
with no monitoring, retaining the confidentiality of borrowers’ records and
signing license agreements to prevent users’ browsing history and use of
electronic materials from being divulged by third-party vendors. Universities
have been working hard to meet different users’ needs because they believe that
students are the future of the nation. It is the role of the LLA to set clear
rules and practices to foster intellectual freedom in all type of Lebanese
libraries.
Intellectual freedom is
fundamental for a democratic system. Innovation is another aspect of intellectual
freedom in its relationship with democracy. Exploring information, new thoughts
and ideas leads to innovation in all fields. However, this objective cannot be
achieved without the respect of individual privacy. Libraries have always been
pioneers in defending individual privacy. With the technological evolution,
privacy has been more exposed. Thus, it is more important now than even before
for librarians to fight for their patrons’ privacy. There are many things that
could be done, yet education and public awareness are fundamental. While ALA is
continuously fighting for intellectual freedom, the question is what more can
be done to protect our privacy.
Brey, C. A.
(2002). Libraries as places of democracy. Texas Library Journal, 78(1),
30-33.
Chmara, T. (2012). Privacy and E-Books. Knowledge
Quest, 40(3), 62-65.
Privacy and Confidentiality: Library
Core Values. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/advocacy/privacyconfidentiality/toolkitsprivacy/privacy-and-confidentiality-library-core-values
Questions and Answers on Privacy
and Confidentiality. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/librarybill/interpretations/qa-privacy
Joseph, it was really interesting to read about the difference between Lebanese public libraries and Lebanese academic libraries! (And to compare Lebanese public libraries to American libraries). That's great the the universities are working toward higher levels of privacy and no censorship (even if "banned" books cannot circulate outside the library). Are public libraries working on changing their strict stance, or do you think they will stay the same?
ReplyDelete-Kaitlin
Hi Joseph,
ReplyDeleteIt is pretty sad that because of the advancement in modern information technology that our user privacy can be jeopardized. The main purpose for libraries is to increase learning and innovations. With privacy rights being taken away, it is difficult for librarians to adhere intellectual freedom values that the ALA holds.